If you looked at our record on Saturday, October 17, 2026, and looked again on Saturday, October 24, 2026, three of the assets in it would look untouched. Monero carried a B both times. Ethereum Name Service carried a C both times. JUST carried a C both times. All three held the same score to the decimal on both dates.
In between, all three lost that letter and got it back.
That is the week, and it is worth a few minutes of your attention, because the thing that moved in each case was not the number.
The three round trips
Monero (XMR). Our record graded Monero B / Sound at 72.5, ranked 5th, on 2026-10-19. On 2026-10-20 and 2026-10-21 it reads F, excluded from the ranking, at 72.5. On 2026-10-22 it reads B / Sound at 72.5, ranked 5th again, and it still reads that on 2026-10-24. The score is the same number, 72.5, on every one of those dates. Our record attaches no cause to either move, and we are not going to invent one.
A B-graded asset reading F at 72.5 is the clearest illustration we have of something our framework has always been explicit about: an F is a gate failure, not a low score. A low score is not the only road into an F, our record does not say which road a given asset took, and we do not guess. Our standing assessment of the asset itself, read on 2026-10-24, is unchanged in character: "Monero remains a durable privacy asset with clean supply dynamics and active maintenance, but ecosystem breadth is still limited." That is an assessment of the asset. It is not the reason the letter moved.
Ethereum Name Service (ENS). C at 56.4 on 2026-10-21, ranked 19th. F at 56.4, excluded, on 2026-10-22 and 2026-10-23. C at 56.4 again on 2026-10-24, ranked 20th. The score reads 56.4 on all of those dates, and on 2026-10-17 as well. ENS is the naming layer for Ethereum: it maps readable names like alice.eth to addresses, content hashes and metadata, which makes it an identity and address-resolution layer rather than an application. Our standing read on 2026-10-24: "ENS remains a durable naming-layer asset with steady usage, but valuation and momentum are only moderate."
JUST (JST). C at 44.4 on 2026-10-21, ranked 45th. F at 44.4, excluded, on 2026-10-22 and 2026-10-23. C at 44.4 again on 2026-10-24, ranked 47th. 44.4 on every date, 2026-10-17 included. Our record identifies JST as a decentralized-finance token in the Tron ecosystem and is candid that the material it holds does not establish whether the token is used for governance, collateral, fees or rewards. Standing read, 2026-10-24: "JST remains usage-supported, but value accrual and moat evidence are still limited."
And a fourth, nearly: Dash (DASH) read C at 51.2, ranked 33rd, on 2026-10-17, F at 51.2, excluded, on 2026-10-18 and 2026-10-19, and C at 51.2, ranked 32nd, on 2026-10-20. The score held 51.2 through all of it. By 2026-10-24 Dash reads C / Speculative at 52.0, ranked 33rd, so the only score movement came after the letter was already back. Dash is a long-running payments network with incentivized masternodes, InstantSend settlement and ChainLocks finality; our standing read on 2026-10-24 calls it "a mature, actively maintained payments network with limited dilution and only moderate fundamental momentum."
The one where the number did the work
Not every letter this week behaved that way. Decred (DCR) read B at 60.2 on 2026-10-23 and C at 59.7 on 2026-10-24. That is half a point, and half a point is all it takes when a score is sitting on a band edge: our published bands put B at 60 and above and C from 40 to just under 60, and a tripped gate places an asset in F at any score, including a score in the A band. Decred shares 59.7 with another ranked asset on 2026-10-24, so we are not printing a position for it.
Read those two together and you have the useful distinction. A letter can move because the score crossed a line, as Decred's did. A letter can also move while the score does not twitch, as Monero's, ENS's and JUST's did. Both are real rating changes. Only one of them is visible if you are watching the number.
The week in one paragraph
Between 2026-10-17 and 2026-10-24, eighteen assets in our record changed letter at least once, across 23 letter changes in the dated readings in between. Thirteen of them carry a different letter on 2026-10-24 than they did on 2026-10-17. The gap between those two counts is this week's story: several assets moved and moved back, so an investor who compared only the two Saturdays would see nothing happen to Monero, Ethereum Name Service, JUST or Dash. Of the thirteen that did end the week somewhere new, four got there without their score moving at all: BNB (C 59.9 to F 59.9), LayerZero (C 58.8 to F 58.8), Lighter (C 50.4 to F 50.4) and XRP (F 55.4 to C 55.4), each figure read on 2026-10-17 and again on 2026-10-24.
For reference, our model's position limit is a grade-level number and not a reading on anyone in particular: on 2026-10-24 it caps a single B-grade position at no more than 10%, and a single C-grade position at no more than 2% to 3%. It says the same thing to everyone at that grade.
What to do with this
Nothing in this piece requires you to act, and none of it is addressed to your holdings. But it does answer a practical question: how often is it worth looking?
If you check a grade whenever you happen to think of it, you will see the letter that happened to be showing when you looked. Monero's week is the clean example: there is a reading of our record dated 2026-10-19 in which it is a B at 72.5, and a reading dated 2026-10-20 in which it is an F at 72.5, and both are what our model published. The record keeps all of it, which is the point of having one.
If you would rather be told when a letter moves than go looking for it, that is what Alerts is for: pick the assets you care about and get told when our grade on one of them changes. It is free with a free CryptoGrade account, and it is the same feature for everyone who signs up.
The individual records are open too: Monero, Ethereum Name Service, JUST and Dash. And if you want to learn why an asset's score moved, log in to your free CryptoGrade account to learn more.
Worth your time separately, from our founder: The Low-Effort Guide to Staking in 2026 (and What the Yield Really Is).
